Animism, America, Religion and Politics

by davidwatson on November 1, 2011

In a recent visit to South Africa I spent two weeks traveling in areas where Animism is the primary worldview, regardless of what religion is practiced.  Animism, at its most basic, is the belief that there is a spiritual world and a physical world, and one can control or affect the physical world via the spiritual world.  It is a mechanical system that believes if one says or does certain things (prayers, incantations, sacrifices, curses and charms), then the spirit world is impacted and this has direct effect on the physical world.  The Animistic Worldview does not promote a belief in a Creator, but recognizes there are good and evil spirits whose favor must be bought, earned or stolen through power and/or deceit; whose anger or evil must be appeased and/or used for self and against others; and that some people have the capacity or power to coerce the spirits to do their bidding (shamans, witch doctors, spiritualists, warlocks and witches).

One new revelation for me during my discussions about Animism with David Broodryk of South Africa was that in the Animistic Worldview there is a fixed amount of stuff and energy in the world.  This means that for one person to gain, another has to lose.  If one wants to be less poor or more rich, then one has to take from others or through the spiritual world cause the transfer of stuff from one person to another.  Most hexes and curses are for this purpose.

In recent years I have seen the Animistic Worldview gain de facto ground in modern Christianity in America.  There are books, sermons, and attitudes that reveal a strong tendency among Americans to think that if they say or do certain things, then God will respond in certain ways.  If we tithe, God will bless us.  If we pray, God will do what we ask.  If we wear or display certain medallions or symbols, God will protect us.

It seems we have forgotten that the life of a Christian is about conforming to God’s will, not God conforming to our wills.  Faith is being obedient to God regardless of the outcome for me personally.  Prayer is not about getting God to do things for me or us; it’s about changing our attitudes and actions to please God, getting to know Him better, and serving others more effectively.  Ministry is being used by God to answer the prayers of others through service.  And worship is not just about going to church to receive a blessing; it’s about being the church every day and presenting our lives as living sacrifices that are individually and collectively pleasing to God and a blessing to others.

Politically, I am seeing a significant worldview shift in America.  When I was growing up in the 50’s and 60’s, when one saw someone who was successful, the thought was not “How can I get what they have?” – the thought was “How can I learn what they know and create that for myself?”.  The basic worldview was based in a Creator who created us in His own image, which included knowledge and creativity, and the ability to create new stuff, wealth, energy, and a better life.

Today, we have Occupy Wall Street, which is grounded in an Animistic Worldview that believes, “In order for me to have the stuff I want or deserve, I must take it from others who have that stuff.” There is a fixed amount of stuff and energy, so for me to be happy and healthy I must take what I want or need from others by any means available.  As a matter of fact, those who have stuff have it because they took it from others, so it’s perfectly OK for me to get stuff by taking it from them.

At its root, any form of socialism or progressive-ism is an Animistic Governmental System that attenuates the flow of stuff and energy from those who have to those who don’t have in a way that promotes law and order in a worldview that says it’s OK to take what you want if you have the power to do so.  In effect, government becomes the shaman or witch doctor that causes the redistribution of wealth at a level that keeps both the rich and the poor happy.  This system causes a loss of creativity and accountability that is at the core of a worldview that acknowledges a Creator who endows His creation with the ability to create – not simply in the physical world, but in the world of ideas and service to others.  The Animistic Worldview fosters deceit, control, low accountability and hatred.  A Creative Worldview generates openness, cooperation, high accountability and care for others.  Idealistic?  I hope so!  How else can we set goals for ourselves and our society?

Those who subscribe to a Creative Worldview are engaged in society, making sure everyone has the opportunity to learn and be creative in knowledge as well as service to others.  This produces the stuff we need, and we are open to sharing it with those who don’t have because there is no end to resources when we are creative.

The shift from a Creative Worldview to an Animistic Worldview will destroy America.  This shift takes place as American Christians practice de facto Animism in our homes, businesses, churches, and political systems across our great nation.  Our political system grew out of a Creative Worldview.  As the Animistic Worldview replaces the Creative Worldview in America, America will go the way of many countries that are rooted in an Animistic Worldview – poverty, and class warfare brutally controlled or used by government or rebels to shift power and resources from one group of people to another in order to empower and enrich those who are in control or who gain control.

Dear God, help us to know you better and serve others more effectively!

Blessings!

David Watson
Irving, Texas

 

 

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

1 gudatt.com November 1, 2011 at 12:04 pm

Wow, David, that was well written. I learned two things from your article. One, the connection between limited resources and animism. And, two, and this is personal, that I as a believer in Jesus Christ have been influenced by the belief in limited resources. In certain areas of my life, I have allowed the "limited resources" belief to influence my thinking about relationships with others where there are financial transcations involved. I will consciously apply the Creative Worldview in all areas of my life. Peace to you and thanks.

Reply

2 Fred November 2, 2011 at 2:42 am

David, thanks a lot for this input. It is very important. One aspect you left out. The anaimistic world view is what comes naturally. If you don't decide consciously, if you let the flow of things flow, animism is what you get. One has to decide on one's worldview, goals and values to leave animism behind. If you follow your feelings, it is animism. If you follow your mind, it is animism. If you follow your creator and saviour, things change. It takes an act of our will and not just one.

Reply

3 David_Watson November 2, 2011 at 7:43 am

Thanks, Jeffrey. Good input. When our children are immersed most of the day in Animistic Worldview, if there is not a conscious imparting of the Creative Worldview on a day to day basis in such a way that decision is required, then the likelihood of adopting an Animistic Worldview increases dramatically. We must be living out our faith consistently at home and in the world, and we must be teaching/training our children to be critical thinkers. To allow ourselves or our children to mindlessly accept or ignore what is being said or portrayed through all forms of media is courting disaster for our families and our society.

Reply

4 Terry November 2, 2011 at 9:15 am

David, I agree with what you are saying and have been known to say it myself. I remember you saying years ago that the sinner's prayer may be leading as many people to hell as to heaven. I'm not sure of the good/bad ratio, but I do know that it can be used as a magical spell that obligates God to grant salvation. I know a young man who lives a horrible, non-repentant lifestyle and quotes "Once saved – always saved". I agree that animism is alive and well in America – unfortunately even in the church.

Reply

5 David_Watson November 2, 2011 at 1:03 pm

I don't know the ratio, either. But if our church stats are correct, more than 75% of the people who profess to be Christians never enter a church of any kind. I can't speak to their service/ministry to others, but my gut tells me it's close to zero. Our love language for God is obedience to His Word and service to His creation.

Reply

6 David November 2, 2011 at 12:35 pm

That is an astute analysis of both our political and spiritual climate. Very well put. The church in America is vulnerable to this animistic influence because of the lack of obedience based discipleship in our approach to evangelism, I think.

Reply

7 Val in Cape Town November 2, 2011 at 3:04 pm

So many chain emails are animistic in their pattern as well. I am often amazed at how many strong believers perpetuate these types of emails through their networks. While the actual content is often not the problem, it is the "promise" that something good will happen to you if you pass it on to 10 others.

Reply

8 Ryan November 6, 2011 at 8:01 am

Unlike others, I found this post underwhelming. If, as you claim, socialistic government is tantamount to animism, then it seems to me that the Torah encourages "animism." Just read the Levitical and other accounts which doubtlessly espouse a kind of socialism (year of Jubilee; forgiveness of debt every 7 years; consistent redistributions of wealth; etc). Certainly the economics of God's Torah are not animistic!! That said, I wholeheartedly agree with you that church life in America is steeped in animistic mumbo-jumbo. I don't take issue with that point. But your political arguments reveal more about your own ideological dispositions than they do about any kind of essential link between animism and socialism. (Highways; libraries; police force; fire fighters; public education; the penal system; potable public water; and countless other systems are radically "socialistic" and also radically American. And they all depend on the redistribution of wealth, which is a fundamental feature of taxation.)

Reply

9 David_Watson November 6, 2011 at 10:06 am

The post certainly reflects my religious and political views. However, there is a significant difference between the theocracy of the OT and socialism – i.e. God. Your argument that infrastructure is socialistic is way off. Socialism is the redistribution of wealth, often against one’s will and with no benefit to the person whose wealth is taken. Supporting infrastructure is an integral part of government of all stripes and is about the fair payment for goods and services that make community work. Education and healthcare are certainly a part of this equation if minimum standards for everyone are established and provided, but allows for those who have the means to strive for more (if they want). You equate taxation with socialism. This can be true in some systems, but certainly not all. Monarchies tax. Dictatorships tax. Republics tax. Democracies tax. Interestingly enough, extreme socialistic systems don’t tax because the government owns everything and keeps the profit for themselves while forcing the people to live at often substandard levels of housing, income, healthcare, infrastructure, and quality of life.

The real issue here is about doing what’s right in God’s sight for those who cannot take care of themselves. One of the functions of government should be to protect the weak members of society. This is quite different than coddling the lazy members of society or saying that every member of society should be paid the same regardless of capacity, training, excellence and hard work. There are differing values for the way in which individuals support society. Not everyone has the capacity or is willing to work hard enough to become a physician, scientist, engineer, business owner and etc.

In a society that has the Creator God as a significant part of it’s worldview, everyone should be given the opportunity to develop to his or her capacity. This is for the good of the society. This is not socialism, which tends to bring everything to a common minimum. It seems to me that most socialistic systems want to make sure everyone reaches the same level of incompetence so that the elite in charge can keep what they have. The socialistic worldview is based on the view that there is limited stuff that must be kept and protected, and just enough is given out to keep people happy while the elite can enjoy their wealth of stuff.

OT law allowed for those with capacity to excel and rise up in society. But it also recognized that power would supplant ability, so every fifty years the table was reset (Year of Jubilee) to make sure that power was not the basis for society, but that capacity and hard work were the basis for society. You will note that the value of everything was measured by the time remaining to Jubilee. Jubilee is not a system that can be made to work in modern society. But we can make sure that every person has access to quality education and opportunity to excel. Quite frankly, this seems to no longer be the case in America. When I attended university my tuition, books and fees were less than $250 per semester. A month’s work in the summer covered all my educational costs for a year. Today, university education starts at about $250 per semester hour, or about $4,000 per semester including books and fees. At $10 per hour one has to work 800 hours, or about 5 months full time to pay for one year of university. In other words, the average person cannot go to university and survive without loans or support in some form. The system has developed into one that only the elite can have easy access. This is a table that needs to be reset. Power and wealth should not be the determining factor for getting an education if one has capacity for learning and giving back to society. A Creative worldview society would make sure that everyone has access to education at a fair price. This resets the table every generation, allowing society to continue to develop, improve, and create. Power and influence will always be a part of the fallen world. But we can put in systems that attenuate this power.

This is too big a topic for a complete review. This article is about worldviews – Creative or Animistic; and the impact these worldviews have on society.

Blessings!

David Watson

Reply

10 Tres November 6, 2011 at 8:22 pm

Excellent point with the example of the state of higher education in our county. National Inflation Association has done extensive research in their latest video offering called "College Conspiracy" found at http://inflation.us/videos.html
Great post and reply,
Blessings Brother.

Reply

11 Jim November 14, 2011 at 9:41 pm

There is an interesting dichotomy in Western society regarding Animism. On the intellectual level, anyone who would overtly subscribe to animism (or anything acknowledging the reality of spiritual power or a spiritual world) is marginalized by the intellectual elite — not through rational argument but through sarcasm and derision. Classic Greek sophistry at work. But on the "lived life" level, we are increasingly attracted to and influenced by Animism. We are among the most "spiritual" cultures in the world, just no longer biblical in our spiritual roots. Note the fascination with the occult, the Twilight phenomena, our preoccupation with the Walking Dead, etc. We intuitively know there is a spiritual world that our intellectual facade of materialism can't explain, so we are more and more characterized by the split level world that Francis Schaefer described many years ago. But since as Marx says the point of philosophy is really to change our world, it would be interesting to hear how you propose that we can strategically engage this trend as Christians.

Reply

12 Jay November 29, 2011 at 9:50 am

Great article!
As to the belief in a "fixed amount of goods," most of the world lives with the belief in limited goods. Many North Americans, from a "go west young man," mentality, work off of a new frontiers to conquer paradigm, and often find it hard to understand another point of reference. I believe that earth is not totally a closed system; God enters in and adds his blessings, but for the most part there is a limited amount of land, water and other resources. Just as it is a rare wind that blesses nobody, it is a rare blessing that hurts noody.
Most of the eastern Mediteranean world was and remains in a limited goods paradigm. Reading the Bible from that position changes some of the teachings. Community becomes much more important. Sharing and voluntary rationing are a way of life. The man who built bigger barns was not a good manager of his resources! When the goods are limited for us, we don't cope well and can get violently greedy; check out the videos on Black Friday shopping.

Reply

13 Bob Sherbondy December 23, 2011 at 12:29 pm

I believe that the best perspective on this matter is the principle of faithful stewardship that operates from the fact that God owes everything and he is the great creator. So neither the application of an Animistic Worldview or that of a Creative Worldview will satisfy God's standards for the human care and use of his created resources. Any view of the world's resources that claims that human beings have any ownership rights or creative rights over anything that is in this world is materialistic idolatry, which God strongly rejects.

Reply

Leave a Comment


one × = 9

Previous post: